MBNL – Improving Re-Procurement Readiness for a Critical Infrastructure Contract
Are we ready for contract renewal or re-procurement?

“Fragmented supplier delivery is putting our programme at risk”
Weak scope definition and poor coordination between suppliers often leads to uncontrolled change, commercial disputes, cost exposure and loss of delivery momentum.
See how Clear stabilised a complex transformation programme through coordinated supplier exit, transition management and contract re-baselining – resolving claims while maintaining programme delivery.
The Ministry of Justice technology estate had developed through a series of separate outsourcing arrangements aligned to historic departmental functions such as the Prison Service and Judiciary. Over time this had resulted in fragmented IT services, multiple supplier contracts and inefficient delivery structures.
To modernise the organisation’s technology capability, the Ministry of Justice launched the Future IT Sourcing (FITS) programme, introducing a Service Integration and Management (SIAM) model with multiple service towers and suppliers.
However, overlapping procurements, fragmented dependencies and misaligned supplier commitments created delivery risks during implementation. Some suppliers had already begun mobilisation while others were still being procured, resulting in contractual disputes, claims and programme instability.
Clear Consulting was engaged to stabilise the programme, manage supplier exit and transition, and re-establish commercial and operational governance across the technology sourcing programme.
Supplier Exit and Transition Management
Programme and Dependency Governance
Commercial Negotiation and Dispute Resolution
Contract Governance and Capability